subject
English, 07.05.2021 18:30 lafayette7727

Part 2: Once you have completed your poster, answer ALL the following in at least a three-paragraph persuasive response. Use your Betrayer or Patriot evidence chart from the Canvas lessons and class to persuade readers that
Brutus is either a traitor or a patriot. Remember to use transition words and phrases within your paragraphs and
between your paragraphs-- paragraphs follow the mini-essay format (intro statement, details, concluding statement). In
addition, be sure to explain all the evidence you provide using the elaboration techniques we learned in cycle 4.
* In your introductory paragraph. Be sure to include the details of the text. What should be in the intro paragraph?
What is the title of the play? Who is the author? When was it written? Introduce it. Then state your thesis. Do not just
start writing about it without introducing it to the audience.
*In the body paragraph(s), provide evidence to support your thesis and carefully and thoroughly explain the evidence.
"Ask yourself the following questions about each piece of evidence you provide: Is this line sincere, sarcasm, or
something else? How can you tell? Which words in this line suggest the character's true feelings? Are there multiple
ways to interpret this line? What are they?
Start each body paragraph with a transitional phrase and answer all questions in complete sentences.
* Do not forget to end with a powerful concluding paragraph (something that sums up the entire essay and restates
the thesis). What was Shakespeare's purpose in portraying Brutus this way, or what did you learn about human nature
from this play?
You must provide a minimum of two embedded quotes or paraphrased ideas that prove your thesis. You must have a
minimum of three full paragraphs (an introduction, a body paragraph, and a conclusion)

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 00:30
Which claim does the sentence "teach english and play with children in local orphanages by day and enjoy the sights and new friends by night" support?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:30
In the song mallam sile sings in lines 113 through 130 the knife probably represents
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:00
What do we call a two-syllable metrical foot that consists of one unaccented syllable followed by an accented syllable? a. anapest b.dactyl c.iamb d.elision
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Part 2: Once you have completed your poster, answer ALL the following in at least a three-paragraph...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722359