The CEO d. the editor of the he
Texas Senato
The Texas Department of State Health Services recently released startling new data on the future
of the physician workforce. By 2030, there
including psychiatry, family medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology - to meet patient
demand.
360
done with the late
Medical schools in the Lone Star State won't be able to produce enough graduates to fill these
shortages. Texas will need physicians educated beyond its borders -
at international medical
schools. Many of these doctors are native Texans who pursued their degrees abroad and want to
return home to practice.
Many parts of Texas are already doctor deserts. Consider the gap in mental health professionals.
live in federally-designated mental health shortage areas, according to
the Kaiser Family Foundation.
do not have a single
psychiatrist, according to data from 2015.
The shortage of primary care physicians is equally concerning. Texas has enough primary care
doctors to meet just half its needs. Dozens of counties have fewer than 10 such physicians. Some
have none at all.
wol sechile
in hand
itrast
The shortage could soon surge. Nearly 30 percent of the state's active doctors are close to
retirement age. Meanwhile, Texas's population is growing at among the fastest clips in the
nation.
Consequently, state officials project that Texas will need thousands more doctors by 2030 —
including more than 800 OB/GYNs, 1,000 family medicine physicians, and 1,200 psychiatrists.
These physician gaps threaten Texans' health. According to a review of the scientific literature
conducted by a researcher at the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, “Improved
Summary summary

Hurry 50pts read the excerpt from justice curtis’s dissenting opinion, then answer the question that follows. slavery, being contrary to natural right, is created only by municipal law. this is not only plain in itself, and agreed by all writers on the subject, but is inferable from the constitution, and has been explicitly declared by this court. the constitution refers to slaves as “persons held to service in one state, under the laws thereof.” . . . . it was certainly understood by the convention which framed the constitution, and has been so understood ever since, that, under the power to regulate commerce, congress could prohibit the importation of slaves; and the exercise of the power was restrained till 1808. a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba, and brings them to the united states, where they are set free by the legislation of congress. does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? if so, what becomes of the laws prohibiting the slave trade? if not, how can a similar regulation respecting a territory violate the fifth amendment of the constitution? . . for these reasons, i am of opinion that so much of the several acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws. –dissenting opinion on dred scott v. sandford, justice benjamin curtis which evidence best supports curtis’s opinion that dred scott should be free because he lived in a free territory? check all that apply. “the constitution refers to slaves as ‘persons held to service in one state’” “the convention which framed the constitution . . has . . the power to regulate commerce.” “a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba.” “does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? ” “acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws.”

May someone me answer these questions

Which statements about the controlling idea of a text are true? check all that apply.