Which of these best describes how the two authors support the claim that the chemicals in the fluid used in hydraulic fracturing are harmful to people?
A The author of "The Benefits of Shale Gas" says chemicals rarely contaminate water, while
the author of "Stop the Fracking!" says that the chemicals almost always contaminate
water.
B The author of "The Benefits of Shale Gas" says the fluid contains only a small amount of
harmful chemicals, while the author of "Stop the Fracking!" says the fluid consists mostly
of harmful chemicals
C The author of "The Benefits of Shale Gas" says that gas companies do not drill near
drinking-water sources, while the author of "Stop the Fracking!" says that gas companies
almost always drill near drinking-water sources.
D The author of "The Benefits of Shale Gas" says that the water is still safe to drink, while
the author of "Stop the Fracking!" says the water is not safe to drink.

The answer is C

the correct answer is a. how to make proposal that works.

indeed, the register is quite formal and the tone is especially objective as it avoids the use of the first and second person singular (i, you) and opts instead for the third person plural which is more impersonal and focuses on the data and the argument that is being developed by the author. the formality adds the impression of respectability to the work and the impersonality adds objectivity to it.

the most ethic and honorable thing for the newspaper to do are:

be completely transparent in reporting about the company’s attempt to trade favors.

contact other construction companies to tell them about the situation.

these two options are the most ethic because both promote the market fair course, by telling the other competitors about the company attempt to get ahead in the market by trading favors, the market is guaranteed equality and justice in the trading of goods and services.