Which facts can be used to argue against controlled burns?
check all that apply.
the number of escaped fires seems to be trending up.
we do not know how many of the “success” burns might have been near misses. the estimated number of prescribed burns is 4,000 to 5,000 per year.
the report does not say how destructive the escaped fires were, only how many there were.
the report admits that prescribed burns have elements of risk and uncertainty. one percent of the burns cannot be proven successful.

Explanation:

We can discuss the estimated number of prescribed burns. The number is not so small. That is not the right number. Many people do not want to go to the doctor for medicine. They think there are small burns so they do not have an obligation to check a doctor. Their burns are threated by medicine from the pharmacy.

Another fact we can talk about is the risk of prescribed burns and one percent who can be threatened successfully. Burns is not only connected with skin, but it also can be connected with our whole body, especially heart. We can discuss risks and injuries except for burns and read about and be well informed.

There are unfortunately those  who suffer the most and their wounds and burns can be solved successfully.

- (1) The number of escaped fires seems to be trending up.  

- (2) We do not know how many of the “success” burns might have been near misses.

- (4) The report does not say how destructive the escaped fires were, only how many there were.

- (5) The report admits that prescribed burns have elements of risk and uncertainty.

the red coloration of the lungs looks alarming and adds to the overall message that the flu is threatening apex

? ? what can you explain this to me i am so confused