Having an unreliable narrator in''top of the food chain'' leads the reader to:
a. feel morally superior.
b. believe he is an expert.
c. take his ideas seriously.
d. question his views

answer: you

explanation: because you posted this stupid question xd

idk

explanation:

the correct answer is "dissent"

explanation:

because dissent is when one or more judges express disagreement with the majority in court, in specific legal systems.   an   argument in opposition is presented to the court, with a different interpretation, or application.

there is a sequence and logical steps to give an answer of a trouble.

1) strategy is necessary to develop an project idea.

2) to study and know the environment where you are going to work ( ecosystem).

3)   the materials resources to built the ideas.

4) to give a priority order in the context that you study. in this case human needs.