Which technique is salim most clearly using in the following discussion? salim: that's not the interpretation i came up with. charles is kind of imprisoned by his truck because he has to work delivering produce all day. how did you see it as a symbol of freedom? bekah: well, he was happy when he got the job. while he knew that the job wasn't for him, he took it because it offered possibilities. the author says "the whole world opened up to him when the truck's engine growled to life." that suggests that the truck wasn't a prison to him. a. asking clarifying questions b. synthesizing claims c. involving all members in the discussion d. returning to the text

The correct answer is A. He is asking clarifying questions. Salim and Bekah had different views and opinions about the text. Salim doesn't get the point on Bekah's view so he wants Bekah to clarify things for him. This is clear when he asked "How do you see it as a symbol of freedom?".

first of all wood chucks don't "chuck" wood. none, and for the fun of the answer the amount of wood chucked would be a lot!

explanation:

a wood chuck is a ground hog, it belongs to the family of large underground squirrels. it belongs to the family of marmots. ground hogs eat grasses, berry's, and other vegetation.

sensory details?

so i`m assuming you are writing something from a bats (the animal) point of view. if this is the case, you can use sights, sounds, feelings, and tastes.

and idk what you mean by domain, but all of the sensory details will depend on where the bat is.

a bat doesn't see color very well, so its surroundings will be dulled.

it can hear super well. so maybe it can hear the insects on the ground

feelings. you can imagine how a bat would feel from its perspective. it all depends on where it lives.

maybe it can taste the salt in the air, or smell water, or something. all of these details are completely dependent on where it is located.

hope this .