Explain how levitt and dubner’s argument effectively uses logical, concrete evidence to arrive at conclusions about morality. address how well reasoning and evidence are used.

their claim about cheating existing in high-incentive situations

the facts they present about sumo and the bagel business

their use of statistical evidence

their use of different examples (sumo and bagels) in their evidence

their overall use of inductive reasoning to arrive at a generalization about morality

the: determiner

storm: noun

remains: verb

a: determiner

threat: noun

to: preposition

the: determiner

coastal: adjective

village: noun

to me i think class room sitting education is better. i do online school and i have not learned a think haha. when i sit in the classroom i just sit there and kind of pay attention but still i get so far ahead in the class when im doing online i have nothing else better to do but play video games and i sit in school and learn and have friends and just actually learn. when i'm doing online i sit here listing to music and get on and and look up the answers i guess that is my fault for being a cheater. but to be honest i think sitting in the classroom is better.