subject
English, 29.01.2020 01:01 elijah1090

An author claims that "athletes caught using performance-enhancing drugs should be sentenced to prison." the author provides the following reason as support: last year, 709 citizens were caught using steroids. 403 were put in jail. in the same period of time, 120 professional athletes were caught using steroids. none of them was sent to prison. there is no reason why athletes should not be punished just like everyone else. which choice best describes the reason the author provides? it is effective. it supports the claim clearly and logically. it is emotional. it expresses personal feelings that cannot be backed with research. it is irrelevant. it discusses a fact that is off topic and does not support the claim. it is unverified. it does not cite a source to show where the information was located.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 20:00
Who else did the prussian soldiers interact with other characters?
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 22:00
How does storytelling imagine the future?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 00:20
The opening stanza portray a frightened narrator fleeing though darkness. how does it rhythm reflect and enhance its meaning
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 11:30
What is the correct way of writing the following sentence? you’re headed for the big time kim said. a. “you’re headed for the big time,” kim said. b. your headed for the big time, kim said. c. you’re headed for the big time, kim said. d. “you’re headed for the big time” kim said
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
An author claims that "athletes caught using performance-enhancing drugs should be sentenced to pris...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 07.07.2019 09:00
question
Mathematics, 07.07.2019 09:00
question
Mathematics, 07.07.2019 09:00
Questions on the website: 13722359