Which is true about evaluating texts?

a. an effective thesis statement will state the obvious and leave readers asking “so what? ”

b. creating outlines or graphic organizers for texts you have read can you analyze how the authors made their points.

c. the following is an example of a good thesis statement comparing multiple authors’ perspectives. “both martin and mckenny argue that the declaration of independence is an important historical document.”

d. evidence from the text provides weak support for a claim comparing multiple authors’ perspectives.

The correct answer for:

Which is true about evaluating texts?

A. An effective thesis statement will state the obvious and leave readers asking “so what?”

Explanation:

To understand the answer we need to analyze all the options.

a) this is the correct option because an effective thesis is meant to awake interest in the reader.

b) Even though this is true, it is not about evaluating texts, but about the employment of outlines and graphic organizers.

c) This can't be asserted from the question. Because we are talking about specific topics about analyzing texts, and they go off the topic.

d) Evidence from the text will always provide data to support the posture of the writer and it will be proportionally relative to the amount of the academic and research elements employed to develop the text.

in this passage from chapter 6 of "animal farm", by george orwell, what the author is ridiculing in this passage is the frivolity of some rules.

clover, the mare, believes she remembers that the fourth commandment forbade sleeping in beds because it was something that humans did. snowball, napoleon, and the pigs are brain-workers who look after the welfare of the farm. they are the obvious leaders because they are smart, and so they are entitled to eat the best food and sleep in beds. it is squealer, who says these lines making the difference between sleeping with sheets, what humans do, and sleeping in beds, what pigs do. the unwillingness to question authority makes the oppressed to obey without thinking.

a, overstatement is the answer