What parts of a story will not necessarily contribute to the theme? (diamond neckalss)

plot structure
character’s actions
the moral of the story
the style of the story

Which statements best evaluate the evidence in thisexcerpt? select two options.o the authors use a personal story to illustrate theargument that, despite new and ever-changing forms ofsocial media, arab american print and broadcast mediaare stronger than ever.the authors use data about the types and effectivenessof social media to support the argument that socialmedia is driving arab american broadcast media out ofbusiness.the authors use a quotation from an expert to supportthe argument that social media has been both and hazardous for the arab american news mediao the authors use a quotation from an eyewitness tosupport the argument that the arab american newsfree daeros challsave and exitnextsubmit

Respond to the following prompts in your initial post: 1. explain if this essay is narrative or descriptive and provide reasoning to support your response. 2. describe what you believe the purpose of the essay is an support your answer with information from this week’s material. 3. now that you have identified the purpose of the essay l, explain why you believe the author did or did not achieve her intended purpose.

Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.