Write a research-based argumentative essay for or against health care for everyone. has to be over 150 characters. I WILL GIVE 100 BRAINLIEST

Everyone should have access to health insurance at no cost to them. Not all can afford it, and as a result, not just people but whole families suffer as a result. Diseases would spread less if health insurance was affordable and open to all.

Some could argue that health care can not be provided free of charge to all because it may harm the economy. The resistance to universal health care, on the other hand, is unfounded, as many European countries have free health care and their economies are thriving.

Finally, universal healthcare will help and cover a large number of people. It is the only solution for the majority of citizens.

The resistance to universal health care, on the other hand, is unfounded, since many European countries have free health care and their economies are thriving. Finally, universal healthcare will help and cover a large number of people. It is the only option for the vast majority of people.

Everyone should be able to get health care, weather it be affordable or free. There are so many situations that can prevent people to be able to get a check or get looked at something more serious. People can die if they let something go unlooked at for so long. For example, imagine you have a lump on your back and you can't afford health care or health insurance. This lump continues to grow bigger and bigger. If this lump is cancerous it could kill you.

Explanation:

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war

do you know the story wonder?

well on wonder it has different stories from each person and they can all share their thoughts and feeling each not just one. if there was one you would only get to see one persons thoughts and feelings. so do a story point on multiple of the main characters.

hope i !

- lilblakeyout