How should a writer address opposing views in an argument? (5 points) 1. The writer should use facts that can be verified to address and disprove opposing viewpoints. 2. The writer should mention opposing views to point out the flaws of those who believe in them. 3. The writer should give equal attention and value to opposing views, including using evidence. 4. The writer should ignore opposing views so as to not bring attention to conflicting information. ​

do you have part b? ?

explanation:

wood chucks can't chuck wood so no wood

the passage can be best described as: "the british legislature extended an unwarranted jurisdiction".

we can say that because the text clearly states how the people of the colonies warned the british about their excessive desire to rule over them, without taking into consideration the difficulties their brothers had experienced in america: they struggled to establish the colonies, to adapt to new types of weather, fight with the natives, etc., and how they now see (or then saw) the only way out was to cut all ties with the british, since they ignored the people's petitions.