I have a poem and I need to know what I can fix on it and what you think grabbed your heart or what would be better to do that.. it is called Sun-burns... thanks Have you found your sun
Does he light your life but leave when he is done
Is his smile so strong
That he leaves you so so stunned Do you try to get closer but end up getting burned
Do you try to hug him longer
But he leaves you days done
That’s what happens when you meet a sun
Nothing there when day is done
And if you get to close
You wined up with nothing but sunburns
That’s why we say Sun-Burns
He’s not here to stay
But WE need him any way
But that’s why we say love hurts
To close you’ll go blind
To far you’ll end in the night
You tried to make him stay
But end up with nothing but HIS Sunburns and the night

This is about when you have to be just friends. He makes you smile but WE can’t have him. And it hurts, falling in love with him but he can’t stay. I wish your sun will see you tomorrow and he realizes he isn’t your sun and want to be more. Greatest of luck thanks. AND THIS I GET EXTRA CREDIT FOR, SO DO NOT FLAG IT THAT IS MAKING ME MAD.

Mr. pontellier did not attend these soirée musicales. he considered them bourgeois, and found more diversion at the club. to madame ratignolle he said the music dispensed at her soirées was too "heavy," too far beyond his untrained comprehension. his excuse flattered her. but she disapproved of mr. pontellier's club, and she was frank enough to tell edna so. which statement best describes the point of view in the excerpt? the third-person point of view is voiced by an objective character in the story. the third-person point of view is voiced by a subjective character in the story. the third-person point of view is an omniscient observer. the third-person point of view is an observer with limited omniscience.

Brainliest asap and 98 points! which word means partially dependent? semi means half in means not inter means between super means over

Read the passage, then answer the question that follows. no one could have seen it at the time, but the invention of beet sugar was not just a challenge to cane. it was a hint—just a glimpse, like a twist that comes about two thirds of the way through a movie—that the end of the age of sugar was in sight. for beet sugar showed that in order to create that perfect sweetness you did not need slaves, you did not need plantations, in fact you did not even need cane. beet sugar was a foreshadowing of what we have today: the age of science, in which sweetness is a product of chemistry, not whips. in 1854 only 11 percent of world sugar production came from beets. by 1899 the percentage had risen to about 65 percent. and beet sugar was just the first challenge to cane. by 1879 chemists discovered saccharine—a laboratory-created substance that is several hundred times sweeter than natural sugar. today the sweeteners used in the foods you eat may come from corn (high-fructose corn syrup), from fruit (fructose), or directly from the lab (for example, aspartame, invented in 1965, or sucralose—splenda—created in 1976). brazil is the land that imported more africans than any other to work on sugar plantations, and in brazil the soil is still perfect for sugar. cane grows in brazil today, but not always for sugar. instead, cane is often used to create ethanol, much as corn farmers in america now convert their harvest into fuel. –sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos how does this passage support the claim that sugar was tied to the struggle for freedom? it shows that the invention of beet sugar created competition for cane sugar. it shows that technology had a role in changing how we sweeten our foods. it shows that the beet sugar trade provided jobs for formerly enslaved workers. it shows that sweeteners did not need to be the product of sugar plantations and slavery.