According to the Center for Veterinary Research, once someone is bitten by an animal infected with rabies, the chances of contracting rabies depends on how deep the bite is, how far it is from the head, and how advanced the virus was in the infected animal. How would this evidence support the main idea that not everyone bitten by a rabid animal will contract rabies?
A. by showing that several factors work together to determine whether someone will contract rabies
B. by showing that doctors are not certain which factors control whether someone will contract rabies
C. by showing that only one factor is important when determining whether someone will contract rabies
D. by showing that nearly everyone bitten by rabid animal will eventually contract rabies

it makes the person recieving the message not feel comfortable with the banana

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."