2. Based on the text, which of the following accurately states one argument for and one argument against curfews for minors? One argument for curfews is that curfews lower the teen crime rate. One argument against curfews is that parents, not the law, should decide about curfews for their children.
One argument for curfews is that curfews lower the teen crime rate. One argument against curfews is that parents, not the law, should decide about curfews for their children.

One argument for curfews is that curfews do not take away the rights of minors. One argument against curfews is that parents need curfews to help keep their children safe.
One argument for curfews is that curfews do not take away the rights of minors. One argument against curfews is that parents need curfews to help keep their children safe.

An argument for curfews is that minors should be fined for breaking curfew. One argument against curfews is that minors should listen to their parents.
An argument for curfews is that minors should be fined for breaking curfew. One argument against curfews is that minors should listen to their parents.

One argument for curfews is that curfews do not help with the problem of teen crime. One argument against curfews is that curfews violate the rights of minors.
One argument for curfews is that curfews do not help with the problem of teen crime. One argument against curfews is that curfews violate the rights of minors.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

answer: inference

explanation:

an inference can be understood as a conclusion to which a person is able to get based on reasoning. it is the same as a deduction, a guess, an assumption.   in the sentence presented, the conjunction "but" gives the readers an idea of contrast, and, therefore, allows them to induce that despite the opponent's characteristics, andrea had something different that made her win.

the development of trade during the middle age increased to the change given in the agriculture, which gave money, industry and markets a bigger importance in economy. the agriculture production was more than the consumption, which meant the creation of wider markets out of the areas. besides, with the end of multiple wars, the population increased and new trade routes were created.

the answer is c) !