How do the authors of the two texts differ in how they view the future of artificial blood? A
The author "The Bizarre Quest for Artificial Blood" explains the health risks
associated with artificial blood using hemoglobin, while the author of "Blood. There
Is No Substitute" only refers to the immediate results from testing the artificial
blood in humans
B
The author of "The Bizarre Quest for Artificial Blood" is uncertain about the
widespread use of artificial blood to help patients in need, while the author of
"Blood: There Is No Substitute" is doubtful that artificial blood will ever be an
effective substitute for human blood
С
The author of "The Bizarre Quest for Artificial Blood" describes the promise of an
artificial blood substitute approved to treat patients, while the author of "Blood:
There Is No Substitute" believes that improvements are necessary before an
artificial blood substitute can be given to patients.
D
The author of "The Bizarre Quest for Artificial Blood" believes that the U. S. Food
and Drug Administration will expand approval of blood transfusions using artificial
blood, while the author of "Blood: There Is No Substitute' believes that the US
Food and Drug Administration will continue to prohibit the use of blood
transfusions from artificial blood