Which statement best uses formal language to present an issue to a school board in a formal email? O "Three traffic accidents occurred at the entrance to Westville High School in the last month alone." O "You really should have a cop direct traffic at the school's entrance before someone gets hurt." "Perhaps you've already considered speed bumps, but I think it's high time to look into them again." O "When traffic is not completely jammed, drivers zoom past the school entrance like wild people!"​

Which excerpt from tinker v. des moines shows how precedent support an argument? a. "as we shall discuss, the wearing of armbands in the circumstances of this case was entirely divorced from actually or potentially disruptive conduct by those participating in it. it was closely akin to 'pure speech' which, we have repeatedly held, is entitled to comprehensive protection under the first amendment. cf. cox v. louisiana, 379 u.s. 536, 555 (1965); adderley v. florida, 385 u.s. 39 (1966)." b. "while the absence of obscene remarks or boisterous and loud disorder perhaps justifies the court's statement that the few armband students did not actually 'disrupt' the classwork, i think the record overwhelmingly shows that the armbands did exactly what the elected school officials and principals foresaw they would." c. "i, for one, am not fully persuaded that school pupils are wise enough, even with this court's expert from washington, to run the 23,390 public school systems [n4] in our 50 states." d. "under our constitution, free speech is not a right that is given only to be so circumscribed that it exists in principle, but not in fact. freedom of expression would not truly exist if the right could be exercised only in an area that a benevolent government has provided as a safe haven for crackpots."

How do "the jilting of granny weatherall" and "the love somg of j alfred prufrock" differ?

Similarities between speaker’s delivery and active listening?