(Honest question) Isn't political violence (the means of using violence to push a political agenda) basically the textbook definition of terrorism (the means of using terror and/or violence to push a political agenda)?

the way you put that...

Explanation:

I would think it is, kinda like if someone would try to put religion on one. But i also guess it's how the things are being said and how they are acting upon it.

No, let me explain.

Explanation:

Political violence is used to either a) push the power of a government on its people or b) the people are trying to make a point (whether it's good or bad).

Let's use the BLM riots and some of the violence convade there shall we? There were businesses burnt down and/or looted, people were injured and/or killed, etc. These were meant to push political agenda, actually most of the violence was portrayed by the white protestors not black, these were meant to help for the push of black justice, the abolishing of racism, and equality.

Terrorism is used to strike fear and to force people to do as the terrorists say. ISIS has done many horrible things and killed people so others would obey their commands.

While they seem to have the same meaning the values, and reasons behind political violence and terrorism are too very different things.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

the character has felt many emotions that are mainly focusing on negative emotions.