1.If something happened in ancient Egypt, when did it happen? A. between 1600 and 1900.
B. in the past twenty years
C. before the year 500 a. d.
D. in past one hundred years

2. If a country’s trade is based on farming, what else can you say about that country?
A. Most of the people in the country are farmers.
B. Most of their money comes from selling meat and vegetables.
C. Its citizens eat a lot of fruits and vegetables.
D. It wants to trade its farms for land that borders the ocean

3. If a country’s trade is based on farming, what else can you say about that country?
A. Most of the people in the country are farmers.
B. Most of their money comes from selling meat and vegetables.
C. Its citizens eat a lot of fruits and vegetables.
D. It wants to trade its farms for land that borders the ocean.

4. Using context clues, figure out what the word unlimited means in this passage. How did settlers view the movement west? The settlers viewed the movement west as one of unlimited opportunity. In the West they might find land, riches, and a new life.
A. Settlers were worried that going west would turn out to be a bad idea.
B. Settlers viewed westward movement as something only desperate people did.
C. Settlers thought that their lives in the west would be more difficult than life back east.
D. Settlers believed that going west would bring them everything they wanted

below

Explanation:

1. C

2. B

3. B (did u mean to put this twice accidentally? if its an extra answer that they want, then put a. but its most likely b)

4. D , though i do not know the context of  the passage, im going off the details the passage gives.

the first proposition is to question economic materialism and victorian christianity. the lines are:

“it moves us not.—great god! i'd rather be

a pagan suckled in a creed outworn; ”

wordsworth is stating that nature no longer interests mankind, that the latter is not “moved” by it and explains that ancient western paganism had a more positive attitude concerning nature since it lacked the perv erted judaeo-christian interpretation of having received the world and all its animals and elements from god to use as we , instead of humans actually being not only part of nature but its wardens, meant to appreciate it and protect it.

the next lines are:

“so might i, standing on this pleasant lea,

have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;

have sight of proteus coming from the sea;

or hear old triton blow his wreathed horn.”

wordsworth here make it very clear that by actually looking and contemplating nature, human beings would reconnect with happiness, serenity and purpose. the use of mythological figures is quite evocative as well, proteus is a greek mythological god of the changing sea. he personifies the sea that changes, which symbolizes the way nature changes and inevitably can change to be destructive not only due to natural causes but to human pollution. furthermore, the sea is even more symbolic since all life originated in the sea so it is not only our past but our future since no life form in our planet can survive without water and if all water is destroyed in earth all life will be gone as well.

he then uses triton which is symbolic of the synthesis of both nature and mankind. triton is a mythological greek god that has the upper body of a man and the lower body of a fish (a merman). this human fish duality evokes the fact that humans are not only human but also part of nature, the fish tail representing nature. the main attribute of this god was that he used a conch shell as a horn to calm the roaring seas. in other words, triton uses nature through science for the benefit of human sailors who risk death during tempests. with the use of such metaphor, wordworth is conveying the message that human technology   is supposed to use nature to preserve nature and thereby humanity as well.

the answer to the blank is recite