1. Lines 1-11: What is your conclusion about what Torres is planning to do?

good

Explanation:

ween Torres and Hoddenbach. What is the possible purpose of this example involving these two people?

163)nick said to his mom that he will kill himself

164)she said that honey was sweet

165)nick joked that he called it chicken drumsticks

166)mick said that he totally loved the english premier league

167)nick said that she was amazing

168)nick asked if you were going to finish strong

169) socrates asked that what he wanted the most when he was there

170)murthy said to anna that she had passed the exam

171)he said that he wanted to join it

172)he asked if i have seen the accident

173)the doctor requested to take rest for a week

hope this will

#faaz

&

messi

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.