Which statement best describes the difference between the aesthetic appeal of the two versions of the war of the worlds? the written text relies on vivid description; the radio adaptation uses description and soothing narration. the written text relies on vivid description; the radio adaptation uses frenzied dialogue and sound effects. the written text relies on narration; the radio adaptation uses an upbeat tone and characterization. the written text relies on narration; the radio adaptation uses setting details and research.

The statement that best describes the difference between the aesthetic appeal of the two versions of "The War of the Worlds", by H. G. Wells, is The written text relies on vivid description; the radio adaptation uses frenzied dialogue and sound effects. When reading it is easy to slow your pace for better understanding and it is easy to rely on vivid description which you can go over and over again in search for details. The radio adaptation needs the sound effects in order to make the listener feel what the adaptation of the text wants to convey.

The answer is "the written text relies on vivid description; the radio adaptation uses frenzied dialogue and sound effects."

answer: b. grete might have remained as shy and immature as she was at the beginning of the story.

one of the most interesting characteristics of gregor's metamorphosis is that, although he is the only character who has physically changed, it is this same change which triggered a transformation in the rest of his family.

by taking care of gregor, grete has become stronger and more confident. she has found a life outside of the house, and has become more independent and self-sufficient. the novel implies that the trigger for the change is gregor's own transformation, and that without it, grete was likely to remain as shy and immature as she was at the beginning of the book.

explanation:

insert-draw-chart-arrow