Read the excerpt from a group discussion then answer the question: Susan: I believe that all elected officials should be required to obtain a 4-year degree from a major university because the amount of legal paperwork they have to read.

Jimmy: Are you saying that only people with a 4-year degree can read higher-level information?

Susan: typically yes.

Susan: W*oo h*o! I won. Of course I would win, I always win.

Jimmy: But wait, I wasn’t finished. I disagree with the idea that politicians needing to have a certain educational degree. As Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address states, our government should be a “government of the people by the people for the people.” And, according to the New York Times, a little under 70% to the U. S. population does not have a college degree. So, I cannot support a law that will limit the rights of the majority of our population.

Susan: Huh? What? Oh my, look at the other team! They are a wreck.

Jimmy: I was explaining that although we agree that elected officials should be able to read at a higher level, we disagree on the law that requires a certain level of education.

Susan: Ok sure, whatever.

Within this discussion, who is the better discussion participant? Explain why the other candidate did NOT meet the expectations of a group discussion.

Jimmy

Explanation:

He is formal, calm, composed and refers to evidence frequently as opposed to Susan

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes   any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.

he describes the bird as "stately."

i hope this

~ash belle