How do the author of the two texts differ in how they view the future of artificial blood? А A
a
The author of "The Bizarre Quest for Artificial Blood' explains the health risks
associated with artificial blood using hemoglobin, while the author of "Blood. There is
No Substitute' only refers to the immediate results from testing the artificial blood in
humans
B
The author of "The Bizarre Quest for Artificial Blood" is uncertain about the widespread
use of artificial blood to help patients in need, while the author of "Blood: There Is No
Substitute is doubtful that artificial blood will ever be an effective substitute for human
blood
to human blood. And they
Blood
y your doctor enter the operating
an in New York Citit just that is
want out if he couleure her by
What the patient survived, but not all
Mowe dan some doctors thought milk
1000 Over the centuries, doctors
sheep blood, and even urine. Such
nero
se who have lost a great deal of blood
on Medical staff transfer blood
bod is often in short supply
citie individuals
tes similar to real human
msicker. If scientists succeed,
has turned out to be trickler than
С
The author of "The Bizarre Quest for Artificial Blood" describes the promise of an
artificial blood substitute approved to treat patients, while the author of "Blood: There is
No Substitute' believes that improvements are necessary before an artificial blood
substitute can be given to patients
D
The author of "The Bizarre Quest for Artificial Blood" believes that the U. S. Food and
Drug Administration will expand approval of blood transfusions using artificial blood,
while the author of "Blood: There Is No Substituto believes that the U. S. Food and Drug
Administration will continue to prohibit the use of blood transfusions from artificial blood.
N
!
as that blood has in our bodies