Look at the “Why Say Yes / Why Say No” section of the article. Consider which side you agree more with. Were there other details in the article that could be considered pros and cons? Identify one more pro and one con from the rest of the article and add each to the list. Which side do you think is more persuasive? Explain your position. Your answer should be one paragraph. Submit your response in the box below. (what I think is the Article)
For
“Every school should get rid of vending machines.”
Against
“Students should have the right to choose vending machines in schools.”

“thy baited hooks shall tangle me no more.”

“hath taught me to set in trifles no store,”

“me lusteth no longer rotten boughs to climb.”

heres a link to answer that question enjoy!

the answer is c? i just got it write

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest