Watch the movie - "Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks" and give short answers to each question below. 1. What are HeLa cells? Why are they so important to medical science?

2. Why were the Lackses so upset when they first heard about HeLa cells?

3. How has the idea of "informed consent" changed since Henrietta's day?

4. How does learning more about their mother and sister help Henrietta's children? In what ways does it hurt them?

5. What kinds of innovations have come about because of HeLa cells? In terms of ethics? Technologies?

6. What is the relationship between race and science in this work?

7. What is eugenics? How does it play into the story of cell culture?

8. Why does Skloot bring up the Tuskegee Institute syphilis studies? What issues were raised from those experiments?

9. How does Elsie's experience at Crownsville explicate some of Skloot's primary themes in this work?

10. Does the Lacks family have a satisfactory outcome after their decades of struggling with the HeLa industry? What does "satisfactory" look like for them?

11. Do poor people today have better access to health care than in 1951?

12. Would you let a doctor use your skin cancer cells for skin cancer research? How about for cosmetic surgery research?

You need to watch the movie "Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks" to answer the questions. https://www. amazon. com/gp/video/detail/B071771H23/ref= atv_dp_share_cu_r

Explain how mrs. van daan feels about anne?

Martin luther king jr often spoke of a day in the future when he hoped that his children would be judged not by their skin color but instead by their character. write a narrative essay about a moment in your life when you were judged by something other than the content of your character. use narrative techniques to develop experiencies, events, and characters

Create a well-crafted essay of 1-2 pages outlining a likely theory of king tutankhamun’s death at the age of nineteen. your goal is to convince peers your age that this is the most reasonable theory according to the evidence. incorporate the subjunctive and conditional moods within your writing. use the following rubric to guide your writing. remember to check your spelling (by using a spell checker and also against the original text) to ensure the proper spelling of names and places in king tut’s world. reminder: spell checkers are great, but they’re not always right. think about terms specific to egypt or even tutankhamun’s name. a spell checker won’t know if you’re spelling these correctly, so check with the reading to keep consistent. rubric criterion exceptional capable developing beginning points earned ideas & content main claim supporting details sources are cited clear, focused, interesting ideas with appropriate detail, sources are cited evident main idea with some support which may be general or limited, sources are mentioned main idea may be unclear; supporting detail is vague or off topic, some source information used central idea or theme is not stated; supporting detail may be nonexistent, no sources mentioned organization structure (claim/counterclaim) introduction conclusion strong organization; seamless paragraph transitions; effective and engaging intro and conclusion organization is appropriate but conventional; attempt at introduction and conclusion attempts at organization, inappropriate use of lists or bullets; introduction and conclusion are not developed no introduction or conclusion; no clear organizational framework or transitions voice personality sense of audience appropriate to audience; expressive, engaging, sincere voice is appropriate to topic, but inconsistent or dry voice may be inappropriate; writing may seem mechanical writer’s voice is inappropriate or nonexistent word choice precision effectiveness imagery broad range of descriptive words; creative examples, vivid details and images language is functional and appropriate; descriptions may lack detail or be overdone words may be correct but simplistic; no attempt at detail, description, or examples word choice is limited, words are often misused; supporting detail and examples are nonexistent sentence fluency rhythm, flow variety easy flow and rhythm; good variety in length and structure sentences are appropriate but lack variety and length awkward phrasing and structure, similar patterns and choppy language sentences are incomplete or difficult to follow, language is confusing conventions age appropriate spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar strong use of correct conventions; errors are few and minor most writing conventions correct; occasional high profile errors frequent errors; most do not interfere with readability frequent errors interfere with readability