The first paragraph is text taken from a scholarly book. Below that is an example of how the information has been used by a student. Indicate if you think the use is acceptable (properly cited) or constitutes plagiarism. If it is plagiarism, is it cheating, non attribution, or patch-writing.

Source Material:
"Being able to copy works and adapt your style to that of your master was an important requisite for trainee artists, who would often spend some years working as
assistants in other masters' workshops before becoming masters themselves. Some would travel long distances to do this, which might even be a guild requirement."
(Nash 187).
Nash, Susie. Northern Renaissance Art, New York, Oxford University Press, 2008.

Potential Use (students version):

When looking at artists in the Renaissance, it is important to remember that they didn't just know how to paint from birth but trained. Being able to copy works and
adapt your style to that of your master was an important requisite for trainee artists, who would often spend some years working as assistants in other masters
workshops before becoming masters themselves. In fact, these trainees had extensive trade networks across Europe between artists where they learn new skills
work, and possibly even find a wife.

A)non attribution
B)cheating
C)acceptable use
D)patchwriting