subject
English, 08.02.2021 09:30 jaleelbrown80

The writer is considering deleting the underlined portion of sentence 1 (reproduced below), adjusting the punctuation as needed. Robots are no longer just the stuff of science fiction: increasingly intelligent and humanlike, they interact with people in new and surprising ways.

Should the writer keep or delete the underlined text?
Keep it, because it uses descriptive language to convey the writer’s perspective on advances in robotics and set up the topic of the passage.

Keep it, because it uses descriptive language to convey the writer’s perspective on advances in robotics and set up the topic of the passage.
A

Keep it, because it establishes an optimistic tone about robot intelligence that the writer will go on to undermine using irony.

Keep it, because it establishes an optimistic tone about robot intelligence that the writer will go on to undermine using irony.
B

Delete it, because it makes a claim about advances in technology that is not supported by evidence in the body of the passage.

Delete it, because it makes a claim about advances in technology that is not supported by evidence in the body of the passage.
C

Delete it, because it adds details that do not follow logically from the claim about robots that is made in the first part of the sentence.

Delete it, because it adds details that do not follow logically from the claim about robots that is made in the first part of the sentence.
D

Delete it, because it undermines the writer’s credibility by giving the impression that the writer is biased in favor of treating robots like humans.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 15:00
Why does lewis thomas express concern about what we would say to beings from another planet
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 20:10
Clearly show? ramona: anna, where does the theme seem to change? anna: according the article: "the fault lies with the fda's inability to release enough information in order to regain the public's trust. but perhaps japan is to blame as well. although there are plans to remove the spent nuclear fuel rods and build a permafrost wall around the four damaged reactors, is this really enough to recover damaged trust? " and then sato goes on to explain this statement. o a. challenging established ideas o b. using evidence to support your conclusions o c. asking clarifying questions o d. synthesizing claims into a single conclusion
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:20
()activityconstruct an argument about a topic, theme, or idea that you read about in william shakespeare's romeo and juliet, act ii or act iii. make sure you create a central claim for your argument that is debatable. provide textual evidence from the play to support your argument.my analysis juliet shows maturity by putting their needs before hers. after juliet has arranged her 'death' with friar lawrence, she is an emotionally awoken woman who will do anything to be with the one she loves. "and i will do it without fear or doubt, to live an unstained wife to my sweet love". juliet faces her fears and trusts in god and friar lawrence. she is forced to use trickery in order to stay true to dear romeo. this showed remarkable courage. before she takes the potion she uses a soliloquy that confronts all her fears. she speaks in blank verse showing the seriousness of the situation. when juliet awakes to see a lifeless romeo lying beside her, juliet's maturity and loyalty takes over and she takes the decision to choose eternity over the present. the quotation "then i'll be brief. o happy dagger! this is my sheath; there rust, and let me die." shows the quickness and determination of juliet's death. during the period of a few days juliet matures into a committed and reliable woman and wife, capable of taking decisions without the of others. shakespeare shows this by clearly stating the different stages that happen and by making everything occur in a short period of time.part cwrite a 300-word essay arguing the thesis of your analysis.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:00
In a 10-12 sentence response-style paragraph, explore the degree to which you agree or disagree with faulkner’s message. “i believe that man will not merely endure: he will prevail. he is immortal, not because he alone among creatures has an inexhaustible voice, but because he has a soul, a spirit capable of compassion and sacrifice and endurance. the poet's, the writer's, duty is to write about these things. it is his privilege to man endure by lifting his heart, by reminding him of the courage and honor and hope and pride and compassion and pity and sacrifice which have been the glory of his past. the poet's voice need not merely be the record of man, it can be one of the props, the pillars to him endure and prevail” (faulkner 773-775).
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The writer is considering deleting the underlined portion of sentence 1 (reproduced below), adjustin...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.02.2021 03:30
question
Mathematics, 20.02.2021 03:30
question
Chemistry, 20.02.2021 03:30
question
Mathematics, 20.02.2021 03:30
question
Physics, 20.02.2021 03:30
question
Mathematics, 20.02.2021 03:30
question
Mathematics, 20.02.2021 03:30
Questions on the website: 13722367