Read this excerpt from Reality Is Broken. It’s a bit counterintuitive to think about the future in terms of the past. But as a research director at the Institute for the Future—a nonprofit think tank in Palo Alto, California, and the world’s oldest future-forecasting organization—I’ve learned an important trick: to develop foresight, you need to practice hindsight.

How does the underlined section help McGonigal argue that the history of gameplay can help people predict its future?

It shows that the author agrees with the opposing viewpoint on the value of gaming.

It demonstrates that the author has doubts about using the past to predict the future.

It allows the author to rebut the claim that historical events are never repeated.

It gives the author an opportunity to establish herself as an authority on the topic.

well since i don't know any of the following websites since you didn't list any. ima take a hard guess at it and say national geographic .org

glamis thou art, and cawdor; and shalt be what thou art promis'd; yet do i fear thy nature; it is too full o' the milk of human kindness to catch the nearest way: thou wouldst be great; art not without ambition; but without the illness should attend it. what thou wouldst highly, that wouldst thou holily; wouldst not play false, and yet wouldst wrongly win: thou'dst have, great glamis, that which cries, "thus thou must do, if thou have it: and that which rather thou dost fear to do than wishest should be undone." hie thee hither, that i may pour my spirits in thine ear; and chastise with the valor of my tongue all that impedes thee from the golden round, which fate and metaphysical aid doth seem to have thee crown'd withal.  

he lacks ambition.  

he is hesitant.  

he lacks courage.  

he has moral scruples.