subject
English, 26.01.2021 01:50 Kittylover4812

1. What do you notice about the syntax? 2. Discuss the purpose/effect.

TRUE! --nervous --very, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad? The disease had sharpened my senses --not destroyed --not dulled them. Above all was the sense of hearing acute. I heard all things in the heaven and in the earth. I heard many things in hell. How, then, am I mad? Hearken! and observe how healthily --how calmly I can tell you the whole story.

It is impossible to say how first the idea entered my brain, but once conceived, it haunted me day and night. Object there was none. Passion there was none. I loved the old man. He had never wronged me. He had never given me insult. For his gold I had no desire. I think it was his eye! Yes, it was this! He had the eye of a vulture --a pale blue eye, with a film over it. Whenever it fell upon me, my blood ran cold, and so by degrees --very gradually --I made up my mind to take the life of the old man, and thus rid myself of the eye forever.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 16:00
Auto = self crat/cracy = rule dem = people which sentence used the underlined word correctly?
Answers: 3
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
Ineed ,someone me on this and my other questions
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:00
Read the excerpt from act 1 of a doll's house. helmer: nora! [goes up to her and takes her playfully by the ear.] the same little featherhead! suppose, now, that i borrowed fifty pounds today, and you spent it all in the christmas week, and then on new year's eve a slate fell on my head and killed me, and— nora: [putting her hands over his mouth]. oh! don't say such horrid things. helmer: still, suppose that happened, —what then? nora: if that were to happen, i don't suppose i should care whether i owed money or not. helmer: yes, but what about the people who had lent it? nora: they? who would bother about them? i should not know who they were. helmer: that is like a woman! but seriously, nora, you know what i think about that. no debt, no borrowing. there can be no freedom or beauty about a home life that depends on borrowing and debt. we two have kept bravely on the straight road so far, and we will go on the same way for the short time longer that there need be any struggle. nora: [moving towards the stove]. as you , torvald. how does the interaction between helmer and nora advance the plot? nora realizes that helmer will completely disapprove of her having borrowed money, so she has to continue to keep it a secret from him. nora realizes that she and helmer have the same ideas about financial issues, and the conversation brings them closer together later in the play. helmer realizes that nora is more responsible with money than he originally thought, and he trusts her more with finances later in the play. nora realizes that helmer knows a lot more about borrowing and lending, and she will seek his input later when she needs it.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:00
The point of view in the novel can best be described as third-person omniscient third-person limited second-person first-person
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
1. What do you notice about the syntax? 2. Discuss the purpose/effect.

TRUE! --nervous...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 14:30
Questions on the website: 13722363