Which statement best explains how the participle is used in the sentence? Believing the Spider-Man story would fail because readers would find
spiders unappealing, Martin Goodman refused to publish it.
A. The participle unappealing functions as an adjective that modifies
spiders.
B. The participle would find functions as a verb that describes the
action to readers.
C. The participle refused functions as an adjective describing
Goodman
D. The participle believing functions as a verb that describes the
action of the Spider-Man story

glamis thou art, and cawdor; and shalt be what thou art promis'd; yet do i fear thy nature; it is too full o' the milk of human kindness to catch the nearest way: thou wouldst be great; art not without ambition; but without the illness should attend it. what thou wouldst highly, that wouldst thou holily; wouldst not play false, and yet wouldst wrongly win: thou'dst have, great glamis, that which cries, "thus thou must do, if thou have it: and that which rather thou dost fear to do than wishest should be undone." hie thee hither, that i may pour my spirits in thine ear; and chastise with the valor of my tongue all that impedes thee from the golden round, which fate and metaphysical aid doth seem to have thee crown'd withal.  

he lacks ambition.  

he is hesitant.  

he lacks courage.  

he has moral scruples.

you need to add the passage to the question.