Keisha is writing a research paper on the dangers of distracted driving for her social studies class. She is allowed to use two websites for her sources but one must provide factual data and research information. She
finds a website set up by a mother whose son was killed in a car accident by another driver who was texting
and driving. Keisha locates the author's name on the website, and the site looks professional. However, the
mother not only calls the other driver names, but also says that the other driver's parents did not raise him
right.

Plz help me I am timed plz
Should she use this website as a source of factual evidence? Why?

A. Yes, she should use the site because it will be a good resource against the distracted driver
argument.

В. No, she should not use the site because people who have been directly affected by something
are too close to it to be objective and offer neutral facts.

C. No, she should look for a website that focuses on the facts and data surrounding this issue as
her fact resource. She may choose to use other information from this site for other aspects of
her paper.

D. Yes, she should use the site because it is a credible resource. Distracted drivers are terrible
people, and they need to be stopped!

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

there purpose is to entertain

i don't see it in your profile.