Read the first two steps in writing a rebuttal. 1. Acknowledge the counterclaim a reader might have.
2. Provide a reason the counterclaim is weak.

What is the third step in crafting an effective rebuttal?

Restate the original claim and one piece of supporting evidence.
Present evidence to support this reason and refute the counterclaim.
Explain that the counterclaim is incorrect and restate the claim.
Provide a list of other authors who agree with the claim and its reasons.

According to the text, to become economically successful (self-sufficient), the louisiana superdome, before finding tenants, had to earn between $26,000 and $35,000 in daily rental income. this is evidence that

Read the passage from sugar changed the world. sugar is a taste we all want, a taste we all crave. people throughout the planet everywhere have been willing to do anything, anything at all, to get that touch of sweetness. we even know exactly how thrilling it was to taste sugar for the first time. when the lewis and clark expedition met up with the shoshone, who had little previous contact with old world products, sacagawea gave a tiny piece of sugar to a chief. he loved it, saying it was "the best thing he had ever tasted." sugar created a hunger, a need, which swept from one corner of the world to another, bringing the most terrible misery and destruction, but then, too, the most inspiring ideas of liberty. sugar changed the world. we begin that story with a man who could never know enough. how does the conclusion of the prologue support the authors’ purpose? select two options. it introduces the topic that will be addressed next. it provides information about the authors. it states why the topic is relevant to readers. it cites sources the authors used in the text. it explains how the authors came to study the subject.

What is emphasized in william carlos williams's "landscape with the fall of icarus" but not n pieter brueghel's landscape with the fall of icarus? what conclusions can you draw about the similarities and differences between the themes of the two works?