How does an adaptation where the ghost and Hamlet are played by the same actor differ from an adaptation where the ghost and Hamlet are played by two separate actors? By having the same actor play both parts, the existence of the ghost is proven and Hamlet’s madness is confirmed.
By having the same actor play both parts, the need for vengeance is emphasized and Hamlet’s lack of madness is confirmed.
By having the same actor play both parts, the two characters are separated and Hamlet’s lack of madness is confirmed.
By having the same actor play both parts, the two characters become one and Hamlet’s madness is confirmed.

Read the excerpt from "save the redwoods."another, one of the finest in the grove, more than three hundred feet high, was skinned alive to a height of one hundred and sixteen feet from the ground and the bark sent to london to show how fine and big that calaveras tree was—as sensible a scheme as skinning our great men would be to prove their greatness.which  best  describes how the excerpt appeals to readers’ emotions? the excerpt provides facts about the tree, which impresses readers’ scientific minds.the excerpt describes how the tree traveled to london, which excites the readers’ sense of adventure.the excerpt compares the tree to a person, which makes readers feel sympathetic toward the tree.the excerpt explains how to skin a tree, which makes readers feel awed at the height of the tree.

What logical prediction can be made from this passage?

What can the points on be used for?