What would have happened if John Stone had chosen a different adjective such as serious? It would not have the same depth of meaning. The meaning would stay exactly the same. It wouldn’t imply how all-encompassing their seriousness can be. The poem would not have fit the theme of the art as well.

alright i will show you where to find the answers but only number six is missing i hope this will you and others

step one open a new page and type in:

1.13 graded assignment: write an evaluation of an argument

then click on the first one you see

second once on the page scroll down then behold the answers.

the answer is c? i just got it write

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.