BRAINLIEST A writer is developing a story in which it is not clear at first who is good and who is bad. Which narrator would work best for this situation?

A first-person narrator who can appear to be confused
A first-person narrator who can keep an open mind about the others
A third-person narrator who can create a sense of distance
A third-person narrator who can provide insight into all characters

First choice.

Explanation:

it's the first choice because the writer is developing a story that isn't clear on who's bad or good, so which indicates that the writer is confused.

The correct answer is D

Explanation:

a THIRD PERSON narrator is not a figure in the story, but an "observer" who is outside the action being described. A third-person narrator might be omniscient (ie, able to tell what all the characters are thinking).

i would need the dialogue to answer this.

answer: ok heres what i got on google

explanation: to recognize illness in frogs, toads, newts, or salamanders, look for the following signs:

inactivity or unusual behaviors. the first thing you might notice in your amphibian is abnormal behavior or appearance.

gradual or sudden weight loss.

body/abdominal bloat.

skin blotches.

eye cloudiness.

edema.