Question 2 Multiple Chaco Worth 2 points) Which statement best describes the difference between strong nuclear forces and weak nuclear forces? Weak nuclear forces are involved when certain types of atoms break down. Strong nuclear forces are responsible for holding atoms' nucleus together. Weak nuclear forces hold bonds between atoms together. Strong nuclear forces hold together the nucleus of an atom. Strong nuclear bonds prevent atoms from falling apart. Weak nuclear bonds prevent compounds from falling apart. Strong nuclear forces are involved in breaking electrons from their shells. Weak nuclear forces hold protons in the nucleus.

There are four types of fundamental forces in nature.These are named as gravitational force,electromagnetic force,strong nuclear force and weak nuclear force.

As per the question we have to understand the role of strong nuclear force and weak nuclear force.

An atom consists of a nucleus surrounded by extra nuclear part consisting of electrons in various orbits.The nucleus contains two basic particles called protons and neutrons .Protons are positively charged while neutrons are neutral.Protons being positively charged will impart repulsive force on each other and may come out of the nucleus.But the nucleus is stable.That is due to the strong nuclear force.

Strong nuclear force is a spin dependent and charge independent force which comes into existence due to the mutual interaction of gluons which binds the protons and neutrons .Hence it is attractive in nature.It's 100 times more stronger than electromagnetic force also.

Weak nuclear force comes into existence during radio -active decay .This force is due to the exchange of ' w' and 'z' bosons[the particles like protons and neutrons having integral or zero spin] which are heavier in nature.The role of it is to change protons into neutrons and vice versa.Its a short range force.

Hence the option D

Explanation:

industrialization in great britain began with the global 'industrial revolution', a pioneer. industrialization in russia was the last in europe, a laggard.

great britain’s industrialization was driven by individual citizens, while russia’s was guided by the government.

what are the lines. come on!