Complete your sentence outline. Your outline should have Roman numerals and letters just like the student sample in the lesson and exactly like the template below. Requirements:

Write your outline using complete sentences.

Roman numeral I is your thesis statement in response to the writing prompt.

Outline at least two body paragraphs (so you will have Roman numerals II and III) and the specified number of examples and explanations as a minimum. If you would like to outline additional paragraphs or examples and explanations, just add Roman numerals to your template.

You need to include at least two direct quotations in your examples. Quotations need to be introduced and explained in your sentence outline.

At least one quotation is introduced using a colon correctly.

At least one quotation is introduced using a signaling phrase correctly.

You need to include at least one paraphrased example in your sentence outline. Be sure to label your paraphrased example.

Remember to use the stop light approach (green = topic sentence, yellow = example, and red = explanation) to develop your paragraphs.

Writing Prompt:

What makes King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail" powerful and effective? After reading King's letter, answer the question by analyzing how he uses structure and language purposefully in his text. Provide specific examples from the text to support your analysis.

Thesis:

Topic Sentence:

Example, quote, detail, or fact from the text:

Explanation:

Example, quote, detail, or fact from the text:

Explanation:

Topic Sentence:

Example, quote, detail, or fact from the text:

Explanation:

Example, quote, detail, or fact from the text:

Explanation:

Compare and contrast spoon river anthology

Which statement best explains orwell's feelings about his role as a british police officer living in burma? a.) orwell dislike the imperialist practices of the british but also dislike the treatment he received from the burmese

Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."