It may be used to reconstruct the crime, identify participants, or confirm or discredit an alibi. It also frequently helps to eliminate suspects. It establishes the facts of the crime— for example, that the bullet that lodged in the victim’s heart and caused his death came from the defendant’s gun. It can provide a step-by-step analysis of the events leading up to, including, and following the incident. (A)What is the purpose of these sentences in paragraph 7?

(B)The sentences contrast the role of forensic evidence to the roles of the other kinds of evidence.

(C)The sentences give specific examples to demonstrate how important forensic evidence can be.

(D)The sentences warn that using a single piece of forensic evidence carries serious risk.

(E)The sentences explain the argument that forensic evidence is not enough to prove a case.

the question concerns exactly this part of the speech:

i am not now thinking of the loss of property involved, immense and serious as that is, but only of the wanton and wholesale destruction of the lives of non-combatants, men, women, and children, engaged in pursuits which have always, even in the darkest periods of modern history, been deemed innocent and legitimate. property can be paid for; the lives of the peaceful and innocent people cannot be.

president wilson talks about the lives of people destroyed by german army. but these people are not americans, they are the local people living in europe. the president mentions the barbarity of germans, considering that he is not targeting the nation, instead it is said about german army. the correct answer is the last one.

hasty generalization

the answer is c. hope this

ugly things like bugs or something?