PLZZZ HELP ILL GIVE BRAINLIST!! 1. What is Margaret Simmons’
claim in this argument?
2. What is one counterclaim that
she addresses in the first paragraph and how do you know?
3. How does the evidence in this second paragraph relate to the claim?
What kind of reasoning does Simmons use in the second paragraph? Is her reasoning sound?
5. How is the evidence in the third paragraph related to the claim?
6. What kind of reasoning is used to support the point that technology keeps people from making connections? Does this reasoning
support the claim in a sound
manner?
7. What counterclaim does Simmons use in the fourth paragraph?
8. Does Simmons present enough evidence to convince most people to accept her claim? Why or why not?
1. What is Jody Frank’s claim in this blog post?
2. What kind of reasoning does Frank use here to support her claim? Is her reasoning sound?
3. How does the evidence Frank uses in this third paragraph relate to the claim?
4. What words are used to indicate a counterargument in this fourth paragraph?
5. Starting in the sixth paragraph, Frank uses an extended analogy/comparison to support her point that people have a history of learning to use technology more
wisely. Does her reasoning logically support her claim that technology makes people smarter?
6. Is the evidence Frank uses about the history of cars actually related to her claim?Why or why not?
7. Does Frank present enough evidence to convince most people to accept her claim? Why or why not?

The arctic national wildlife refuge is home to caribou, moose, musk oxen, wolves, foxes, grizzlies, polar bears and migratory birds. leaders in the oil industry believe the refuge is the perfect site for the “environmentally sensitive exploration” of oil. environmentalists are wondering: what will become of the wildlife? president george w. bush, oil-industry leaders and others believe that americans will benefit from the oil that lies under the snow-filled surface of the refuge. in their opinion, the oil will reduce high fuel prices and decrease our need for oil from other countries. i believe the cost of such drilling is too high. i agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou. each spring, the caribou travel 400 miles to give birth on the coastal plain. in this area of the refuge, there are fewer predators. in addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply. is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to these animals? americans are the largest consumers of oil. instead of drilling for oil, we should decrease our need for foreign oil simply by using less. we must all work together to cut back on the oil we use in order to preserve the wildlife of the arctic national wildlife refuge. what type of argument is used in this paragraph? i believe the cost of such drilling is too high. i agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou. each spring, the caribou travel 400 miles to give birth on the coastal plain. in this area of the refuge, there are fewer predators. in addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply. is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to these animals? a. appeal to emotion c. appeal to logic b. bandwagon d. none of the above select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d