Prompt Write an argument for or against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas.

Wild woodland fires cause broad harm to widely varied vegetation and can kill and harm people not just people but nature and the animals. During the time spent controlled consumption, a few wild creatures are killed and lose their natural surroundings, so they have nowhere to live. The thick smoke from the man-made flames is additionally a worry for the creatures. I would think that having the controlled flames to secure wild zones because we shouldn't lose regard for those zones, this planet should be safe not only for us humans, but for any living thing in this world.  

Explanation:

hope this help :) its not much but some :D

uh,

assuming the underlined word is "regnant", the correct answer is b) ruling.