subject
English, 21.11.2020 16:30 backyardmastrs

1. The man and the boy were waiting for the birds. a. early in the morning.

b. towards the evening.

C. in the early afternoon.

2. Why was the boy there with the man?

a. because they usually hunted together.

b. because the boy wanted to watch the birds

c. because the man was teaching the boy to hunt

3. How did they feel when they saw the birds in the sky?

a. The man didn't feel anything but the boy was completely filled with wonder.

b. They were both pleased and got ready to shoot.

c. The man prepared to shoot but the boy was unable to decide.

4. How did the two shoot?

a. The man showed his experience but the boy was rather slow.

b. The man was not successful but the boy was probably lucky on his first attempt.

c. The man rushed through and missed; the boy was more careful and succeeded

5. The man says, "You'll have to look after it.” This shows that

a. the man realised that the boy wanted to take the live bird home.

b. the boy was hoping that the man would look after the bird.

c. the man wanted the live bird to be thrown away.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 23:00
Read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme court’s ruling in plessy v. ferguson, 1896. laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power. how does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether state legislatures are equipped to judge the quality of education offered at segregated schools. the brown case addresses whether authorities believe that one race is inferior to another when creating public schools. the brown case addresses whether these laws inherently deny certain citizens equal protection under the law. the brown case addresses the legality of using police power to monitor public places separated by race.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:30
Accepted is to fact as unproven is to
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:00
Which of the following factors most consistently contributes to the speaker’s believability? a the age and experience of the speaker b the physical environment in which the speech is delivered c the sincerity, knowledge, and trustworthiness of the speaker d the position of the thesis statement in the speech
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:50
[1] nothing that comes from the desert expresses its extremes better than the unhappy growth of the tree yuccas. tormented, thin forests of it stalk drearily in the high mesas, particularly in that triangular slip that fans out eastward from the meeting of the sierras and coastwise hills. the yucca bristles with bayonet-pointed leaves, dull green, growing shaggy with age like an old [5] man's tangled gray beard, tipped with panicles of foul, greenish blooms. after its death, which is slow, the ghostly hollow network of its woody skeleton, with hardly power to rot, makes even the moonlight fearful. but it isn't always this way. before the yucca has come to flower, while yet its bloom is a luxurious, creamy, cone-shaped bud of the size of a small cabbage, full of sugary sap. the indians twist it deftly out of its fence of daggers and roast the prize for their [10] own delectation why does the author use the words "bayonet-pointed" (line 4) and "fence of daggers" (line 9) to describe the leaves of the yucca tree? . to create an image of the sharp edges of the plant to emphasize how beautiful the plant's leaves are to explain when and where the plant grows to show how afraid the author is of the plant
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
1. The man and the boy were waiting for the birds. a. early in the morning.

b. towards t...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722367