subject
English, 20.11.2020 17:50 danielanderson12

Reread this section from Sara's rough draft about the history of the ERA. If the ERA wants to become part of the Constitution, it will have to get past the opposition
this time. Who fought against the ERA, and will they still try to stop it? One argument was
that a constitutional amendment would take away protections that women already have.
The National Committee to Defeat the Un-Equal Rights Amendment created a pamphlet
that stated "the differences in treatment of men and women under state laws are for the
benefit of the family, while others are advantageous to working women."
Which sentence did Sara change MOST when creating her final draft? (Which sentence
most needs revising?)
If the ERA wants to become part of the Constitution, it will have to get past the opposition this
time.
Who fought against the ERA, and will they still try to stop it?
One argument was that a constitutional amendment would take away protections that women
already have.
The National Committee to Defeat the Un-Equal Rights Amendment created a pamphlet that
stated "the differences in treatment of men and women under state laws are for the benefit of
the family, while others are advantageous to working women.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:40
Why are the royals in the woods? a. they are hunting. c. they are drunk. b. they are celebrating the wedding. d. they are lost.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:50
If music be the food of love, play on; give me excess of it, that, surfeiting, the appetite may sicken, and so die. that strain again! it had a dying fall: o, it came o'er my ear like the sweet sound, that breathes upon a bank of violets, stealing and giving odour! now read the excerpt from "the love song of j. alfred prufrock." for i have known them all already, known them all: have known the evenings, mornings, afternoons, i have measured out my life with coffee spoons; i know the voices dying with a dying fall beneath the music from a farther room. what does the phrase "dying fall" most likely mean in both excerpts
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:00
King claudius has resolved to do what (besides send hamlet to england)? what does this reveal about his character?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Reread this section from Sara's rough draft about the history of the ERA. If the ERA wants to becom...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.05.2021 01:00
question
Health, 06.05.2021 01:00
question
Social Studies, 06.05.2021 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722367