HELP PLEASE Representative Weaver claims that his bill is motivated by "safety." "Nearly half of all accidents involve people under the age of 21," Representative Weaver claims.
"Raising the driving age," he adds, would mean raising the level of safety on America's roads." But I would ask Representative Weaver the following questions: Do not nearly half
of all accidents involve men? Wouldn't the streets be safer, then, if male drivers were abolished? And what about the percentage of accidents occur on paved roads? Should we do
away with paved roads, too?
Here are some more questions I would like to ask Representative Weaver: If the driving age is raised to 21. what will happen to all the afternoon jobs, the sports, and programs that
require some sort of transportation? What will happen to America's economy (and its spirit) when high schooler students can no longer work at restaurants?
"A teenager behind the wheel is the symbol of American youth," writes author Peter Chacha. What will happen to this symbol if Representative Weaver's plan is approved? Weaver
also claims that a majority of seat belt violations are the fault of the under-21 crowd. But let me ask you this: Do people under the age of 21 really wear their seat belts less often
than older people, or are they just caught more often? We know the police have their eyes on the teenagers, but are they looking at the adults as well?
Select the correct answer
Which supporting claim does the author offer to support the argument?

A. Teenagers need to drive to participate in activities and jobs

B. Teenagers are better drivers than most adults.

C. Teenagers can learn more rules about driving safety

D. Teenagers learn to drive better later by starting young

Asap plz which sentence from this excerpt of jefferson davis’s inaugural address indicates that secession was the confederacy’s way of reclaiming its legal powers? an agricultural people, whose chief interest is the export of a commodity required in every manufacturing country, our true policy is peace, and the freest trade which our necessities will permit . . there can be but little rivalry between ours and any manufacturing or navigating community, such as the northeastern states of the american union. it must follow, therefore, that a mutual interest would invite good will and kind offices. if, however, passion or the lust of dominion should cloud the judgment or inflame the ambition of those states, we must prepare to meet the emergency and to maintain, by the final arbitrament of the sword, the position which we have assumed among the nations of the earth. we have entered upon the career of independence, and it must be inflexibly pursued. through many years of controversy with our late associates, the northern states, we have vainly endeavored to secure tranquillity, and to obtain respect for the rights to which we were entitled. as a necessity, not a choice, we have resorted to the remedy of separation; and henceforth our energies must be directed to the conduct of our own affairs, and the perpetuity of the confederacy which we have formed. if a just perception of mutual interest shall permit us peaceably to pursue our separate political career, my most earnest desire will have been fulfilled. but, if this be denied to us, and the integrity of our territory and jurisdiction be assailed, it will but remain for us, with firm resolve, to appeal to arms and invoke the blessings of providence on a just cause . .