Part A Which inference can be made about Daniel Williams based on "Healing a Wounded Heart: Daniel Hale Williams"?

Dr. Williams knew exactly what to do when faced with the prospect of performing heart surgery.

Dr. Williams became very wealthy and famous but never lost sight of his purpose.

Dr. Williams was not only a skilled doctor, he was also a kind and thoughtful person.

Dr. Williams had people who could not afford to pay in mind when he opened Provident Hospital.
Question 2
Part B

Which evidence from the passage best supports the answer in Part A?

"Dr. Williams was called in. The doctor reassured the patient with his calm, dignified manner."

"Daniel Hale Williams was not foolish—on the contrary, he was very careful."

"Williams was confident that he could help. But then he saw the wound—it went deep into the chest, perhaps into the heart."

"Provident was the first hospital in the United States in which black and white doctors worked together to care for all patients, regardless of race."

umm there is no difference

great question btw!

the economic activity signified in that scenario is a. production

in general, market production makes reference to the elaboration of a product or service which is destinated for economic purposes (to be sold) at money-price in a market. such product or service has to be principally tradable for money.

there is no money exchange involved in distribution, generalized reciprocity or balanced reciprocity.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

another character. imagine that section narrated in first person point of view from one of the character's perspective, and rewrite it in the space below, attempting to use a similar writing style as the original author. then, in a second paragraph, consider this: are you able to explore some of the same ideas and themes when viewing the situation from the character's first person point of view, as compared to when it is narrated from london's third-person limited