Bryson mentions that there seems to be an "insatiable" urge to discredit Shakespeare the person as the author of Shakespeare's works. Why do you think this might be? Is it an example of something universal, or is it unique to Shakespeare? Please explain why, in your opinion, there is an urge to show that Shakespeare's authorship was not authentic. You may draw from examples from articles or from your own experiences (or the experiences of others) in your response. (300 word essay if possible or just give me bullet points)

In descriptive writing, the conclusion should introduce a new idea return the discussion to the general level use a quotation explain why the essay was effective

How does frost use ambiguity to present his message about walls and neighbours what evidence supports the idea that the speaker believes good fences make good neighbors what details suggest the opposite

In the real world, feldman learned to settle for less than 95 percent. he came to consider a company “honest” if its payment rate was above 90 percent. he considered a rate between 80 and 90 percent “annoying but tolerable.” if a company habitually paid below 80 percent, feldman might post a hectoring note, like this one: the cost of bagels has gone up dramatically since the beginning of the year. unfortunately, the number of bagels that disappear without being paid for has also gone up. don’t let that continue. i don’t imagine that you would teach your children to cheat, so why do it yourselves? the excerpt serves as which type of support for the authors’ argument? a claim an example a conclusion a counterclaim