Fredrick Douglas was against slavery and wanted to try to end it, or at least give most of the slave’s freedom, by crossing them over the Mason-Dixon line. Captain Cannot on the other hand was all for the idea of slavery, believing that there was nothing wrong with enslaving other humans just because they have darker skin. Both use amazing evidence and present their information very straight-forward. But my teacher said You've got a great start to your response. You shared the beliefs of each man, but you are missing specific evidence from the text to support your ideas. If you choose to add it in, resubmit for more points.

so can someone help me with this?

Which example is presented in chronological

Emily is reading her friend's story. it uses transition words like and emily can tell that this story's organization is a) sequence of events b) cause and effect c) compare and contrast d) question and answer

Read the excerpts from “take the tortillas out of your poetry” and “speaking arabic.” my friend had concluded that if he took his language and culture out of his poetry, he stood a better chance of receiving a fellowship. he took out his native language, the poetic patois of our reality, the rich mixture of spanish, english, pachuco and street talk which we know so well. in other words, he took the tortillas out of his poetry, which is to say he took the soul out of his poetry. at a neighborhood fair in texas, somewhere between the german oom-pah sausage stand and the mexican gorditas booth, i overheard a young man say to his friend, “i wish i had a heritage. sometimes i feel—so lonely for one.” and the tall american trees were dangling their thick branches right down over his head. which best states how the structures of both excerpts support ideas about cultural diversity? each incorporates non-english words. each incorporates academic words. each incorporates offensive words. each incorporates nonsense words.