♡︎♡︎♡︎♡︎♡︎ How would the story Pled Piper of Hamelin be different if the rising action were different? If the Pied Piper never came
to the town, what do you think would happen in the story?
♡︎♡︎♡︎♡︎♡︎

i think The problem in the story and the conflict is the townspeople's refusal to pay the piper as they had promised.  They have been provided the service but they go back on their word.  The problem is resolved by the piper because he gains payment by stealing the town's children.

Explanation: im sorry if this wrong ♡︎♡︎♡︎♡︎♡︎

the speech this question is referring to is president kennedy's special message to the congress on urgent national needs, may 25, 1961

kennedy responds in a very direct and concrete way to those thinking that communism is a positive system:

"yet their aggression is more often concealed than open. they have fired no missiles; and their troops are seldom seen. they send arms, agitators, aid, technicians and propaganda to every troubled area. but where fighting is required, it is usually done by others--by guerrillas striking at night, by assassins striking alone--assassins who have taken the lives of four thousand civil officers in the last twelve months in vietnam alone--by subversives and saboteurs and insurrectionists, who in some cases control whole areas inside of independent nations." (kennedy)

president kennedy presents communism as cowardly, as a hidden and treacherous weapon that strikes from the shadows like thieves, he represents the system as not even being capable of showing and open and overt attack or confrontation. to finish up the response, he expresses that the system attacks even a country's idependence and freedom.

b. b. b. is the anoswer