Read the excerpt from Maryam's personal narrative. Which part of the narrative does this paragraph most
likely come from?

O the exposition
O the rising action
O the falling action
O the reflection

The vertical garden that Mr. Lopez taught me how to
build not only changed the way we eat, but it helped my
family spend less on groceries. When the school board
accepted my proposal to start a program to teach
families to grow their own food, I knew just who to call to
help me make it work. Working with Mr. Lopez helped me speak up about the things I believe in, and I hope that my ideas about helping our neighborhood have access to good food will result in a positive change.

Which part of the narrative does this paragraph most
likely come from?

O the exposition
O the rising action
O the falling action
O the reflection

The reflection

Explanation:

Reflective narration is a type of narration where the experiences of the narrator or some other character is described.

From the given paragraph, the narrator describes how the efficiency of Mr. Lopez helped shape her mindset and output at work.

The text shown in the question above shows the plot element known as reflection.

The reflection refers to the moment when the character thinks about his actions, or plans what to do throughout the story.

Through reflection, the reader can:

Based on this, we can see, in the text shown in the question, that the moment the personage thinks about what she will do and reflects on the results of her actions, the element known as reflection is being presented.

You can find more information at the link below:

link

gatsby's clothes have a symbolic meaning, as the use of colour and fabric in his clothing demonstrates his hope, dreams, and wealth. gatsby's clothing symbolizes his wealth through his torn shirt, his silver and gold suit, and his english shirts.

his occupation are

businessman yachtsman soldier entrepreneur bootlegger

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war