Reread the excerpts from the"General Prologue," "The Pardoner's Tale," and "The Nun's Priest's Tale," keeping an eye out for the way the tales present apparent didactic messages. Then write a short analysis of each tale, noting its didactic qualities and the moral that the teller tries to impart. In your opinion, are the stories actually as didactic as they sound? In what ways do they depart from what is normally considered an “instructional” story? Support your analysis with relevant quotes from the excerpts.

answer; i believe that the   correct answer is (d)the use of descriptive words that bring your reader into the story, not using literal words for check luck

answer; (b); the abolitionist movement;

hey, my username is theoneandonly003#9598, add me.

it was surely an odd creature that one made up by reading the historians first and the poets afterwards a worm winged like an eagle; the spirit of life and elegance and charm,   in a kitchen chopping up suet. but these creatures, monst'r however entertaining to the imagination, hast no existence in fact. what one might doth to bringeth h'r to life wast to bethink poetically and prosaically at one and the same moment,   thus keeping in toucheth with fact—that the lady is mrs martin, ag'd thirty-six, did dress in blue, wearing a black coxcomb and brown shoeth; but not losing sight of fiction eith'r—that the lady is a vessel in which all s'rts of spirits and f'rces art coursing and flashing p'rpetually. the moment, howev'r, yond one tries this method with the elizabethan mistress, one brancheth of illumination fails; one is did hold up by the scarcity of facts.   one knoweth nothing detailed, nothing p'rfectly true and substantial about h'r.   hist'ry scarcely mentions h'r.   and i did turn to professeth'r trevelyan again to seeth what hist'ry meanteth to that gent.   i hath found by looking at his chapt'r headings yond t meanteth.