Be a Founding Father Discussion Now it's your turn to be a founding father. Imagine you are able to travel back to the Revolutionary Era, to
during the writing of either the Declaration of Independence in 1776 or the U. S. Constitution and Bill of
Rights in 1781-1791. You bring with you knowledge of more than 200 years of U. S. history (I hope!). What
ONE revision would you like to see?
In 1-2 fully-developed paragraphs, make a convincing case for your suggested revision. Follow these rules:
• You may add to delete from, or modify the document.
• Make sure it is clear which document you would revise, the specific revisions you would want to see,
and your reasons.
• Remember the rhetorical devices we've studied, and use them where appropriate; the founding fathers
are experienced at thinking and debating, so you will have to be at your best to convince them.
• Cite any evidence you bring in as support.
• Respond to at least two of your classmates.
• Finally, keep your comments respectful; condescension and bullying will not be tolerated in this
gentleman's (and ladies') exchange.

for me, i'd go with (c) satisfied or (b) overjoyed because if you read it a couple of times, it makes since that it is c or b. it can't b (a) angry because booker was never angry about anything. at the end of the paragraph, booker states, "i think there are not many men in our country who have had the privilege of naming themselves in the way that i " i think that sentence kind of gives away the also, some words in the paragraph can also you like for example, "indulged," "calmly," "perplexity," "privilege," and defining words that you don't know, can you understand more of that paragraph and it can also increase your comprehension. : )

i'm really rally sorry if i'm incorrect, but if i'm hope this ! : )

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).

synonymous.

he was ashamed of himself